Close dialog
Go back
Skip to content (Press Enter) Skip to footer (Press Enter)

Start your search

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.



 

 Yugo Australia 

Whole-of-Organisation Assessment  

National Higher Education Code to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Based Violence 

 

Introduction 

Yugo is a global student housing provider operating in 14 countries, housing over 100,000 students across more than 110 student accommodation sites. Yugo Global was formed in 2021 through the merger of several established student housing brands: The Student Housing Company, Nexo Residencias, Uninest Student Residences, and UComm. 

The Australian operation of Yugo Global is known as Yugo Australia. It houses approximately 2,000 students across three cities: Melbourne (two buildings), Adelaide (one building) and Perth (one building, with another building opening in July 2026). Yugo Australia is affiliated with Trinity College; The University of Melbourne; Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Adelaide University; The University of Western Australia; INTO-UWA College & Browns College. 

Over 95% of Yugo Australia’s residents are international students, with a proportion of these aged under 18. International students are attracted to Yugo accommodation because of its safety, their ability to mix with other international students, and the opportunity to take up leadership roles as ‘student ambassadors’ throughout their stay. Residents can also participate in Yugo’s ‘Live Your Best Life’ program, which aims to help students develop professional and social skills to prepare them for life after university.    

Yugo Australia is committed to providing safe environments for residents and staff and it welcomes the introduction of the National Higher Education Code to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence. 

Yugo Australia as required by law operates it’s accommodation under the auspices of the Residential Tenancy Act on a State by State basis. 

This whole-of-organisation assessment is framed by Yugo Australia’s understanding of the gendered drivers of violence against women as articulated in Change the Story and reflected in the National Plan to End Violence Against Women and Children 2022-2032: 

Yugo Australia recognises that other forms of discrimination and inequality – such as racism, homophobia, transphobia – intersect with gender inequality to compound people’s experiences of violence. We acknowledge that some of our international students may ascribe to cultural norms that do not align with principles of gender equality, diversity and inclusion. These norms can influence how students interact with women and people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identity, and in some cases can manifest in problematic behaviours that increase risks within the accommodation environment. 

This whole-of-organisation assessment provides a clear and evidence-informed overview of Yugo Australia’s strengths, challenges and areas for improvement in relation to preventing gender-based violence and supporting victim-survivors. These are presented as enablers, risks and barriers in accordance with the language used in the National Code. The assessment is intended to support strategic decision-making, guide future planning and ensure alignment with national expectations and sector good practice. 

A mixed method approach was used to conduct the assessment. Existing documentation, practices and programs were reviewed; consultations were held with leadership, management, staff and residents; and previous responses to disclosures and formal complaints of gender-based violence and other safety incidents were analysed in light of requirements of the National Code.  
 

Focus areas 

The National Code defines Whole-of-Organisation as an approach applied all areas of operation, and at all levels that is evidence informed, uses multiple strategies and is subject to ongoing monitoring and evaluation, including and in respect to: 

  1. Leadership, culture and environment 

  2. Structures, norms and practices 

  3. Systems and infrastructure 

  4. Service delivery 

  5. Policies and procedures 

  6. Management and governance 

  7. Community engagement 

  8. Business 

  9. Research  

  10. Partnerships. 

Purpose-built student accommodation is a unique environment and as such has some distinct areas of operation. This assessment identifies areas of operation relevant to Yugo Australia.  

 

Focus area (a): Leadership, culture and environment  

Leadership, culture and environment assessment 

Enablers  

  • As a global company with local management, Yugo Global’s leadership is comprised of senior executives from a range of culturally diverse backgrounds. Diversity and inclusion are core values of the organisation and play a key role in its success in the student accommodation market.    

  • Yugo Australia operates with a degree of autonomy from Yugo Global, and its footprint in Australia is smaller than other countries. This enables Yugo Australia to tailor operations in a more agile way than its counterparts.  

  • Yugo Australia has a clear commitment to providing safe environments for residents, which is reflected in the practices and personal values of staff. Small teams of staff operate at each site, meaning a culture of equality and respect can be established and maintained quickly. Residence managers at each site play the most significant role in setting culture, and consultation showed all managers have a commitment to the safety and wellbeing of residents and colleagues.  

  • Yugo Australia provides training for all staff on issues that may intersect with gender-based violence, such as identifying and responding to psychosocial hazards as well as mental health first aid training. Yugo also makes its EAP service available to residents following a critical incident.  

  • Site staff work closely together and provide strong support to each other and residents. All site staff reported they would feel comfortable disclosing to a colleague and are confident they would receive a compassionate response.  

Systemic Risks  

  • Diversity and inclusion was identified by stakeholders as a priority of the organisation, but there was less visibility of the organisation’s commitment to gender equality.  

  • Understanding of gender-based violence is inconsistent across the organisation. While some recognised sexual assault and sexual harassment as forms of gender-based violence, knowledge of other forms is limited.   

  • Some stakeholders communicated that in their view, particular incidents of violence – including gender-based violence – have been minimised by leadership. While these stakeholders could not identify reasons for this response, it may be attributable to limited understanding of the effects of such violence.    

  • The commitment of leadership to the safety and wellbeing of staff was described by some stakeholders as variable. While all commended the support provided after a recent critical incident, some commented that addressing the longstanding issue of poor security measures in building reception areas was not considered by leadership as a priority.   

  • Over 95% of Yugo’s residents are international students, with some aged under 18. Some of these students have very limited knowledge of what constitutes gender-based violence in Australia and are unlikely to have received any respectful relationships education – or sex education – in their home country prior to arriving in Australia. Cultural taboos can make some residents hesitant to engage with the issue, and stakeholders reported those who do disclose often experience profound feelings of shame and become distressed at the thought of their family being notified.  Stakeholders highlighted that misinformation from external parties that disclosures might jeopardise visa status posed a significant barrier to residents’ willingness to come forward. This aligns with broader national evidence indicating that perpetrators frequently employ misinformation as a strategy to discourage migrant and refugee victim-survivors from seeking assistance. These issues were identified as significant considerations for the content and cadence of future prevention and response education and training.  

  • While Yugo Global and Yugo Australia actively support diversity and inclusion through social events and campaigns, some stakeholders identified the focus of these events could be broadened beyond diversity of sexual orientation and gender identity to celebrate different cultural and religious identities. Racism was identified as a factor in some critical incidents. 

Barriers  

  • Student cultures across Yugo’s sites vary. While residents in Perth and Adelaide are more engaged in the on-site community, Melbourne residents often participate less as they are more drawn to the city’s broader activities. Staff in Melbourne actively work to engage residents in social events and education and training but noted disengagement is a consistent issue. Others commented new international students are often reluctant to engage in activities as they are overwhelmed trying to navigate their new life in Australia.  

  • Over half of Yugo’s residents select alternative accommodation after their first year. This can present challenges to embedding a long-term positive culture among residents.   

Key actions in response 

Yugo Australia will: 

  • embed a strong top-down approach to promoting gender equality across the organisation and in resident activities 

  • provide specific education for leadership on the effects of gender-based violence and how these effects may manifest in the workplace  

  • provide vicarious trauma training for all staff 

  • ensure future prevention education and training emphasises the role of intersectionality in shaping gender-based violence 

  • identify opportunities to promote gender equality across the organisation and in resident activities, including:  

  • publishing a gender equality statement and include it in resident and staff induction materials  

  • ensuring leadership teams are gender-balanced 

  • designing social events with equity in mind  

  • establish and maintain ongoing dialogue on work under the Plan through resident/staff forums, resident and staff wellbeing events or regular updates.   

     

 

 

Focus area (b): Structures, norms and practices 

Structures, norms and practices assessment  

Enablers 

  • Diversity and inclusion are core values of Yugo and one of the reasons why international students choose it as accommodation. Staff actively promote diversity and inclusion through events and education and tailor information provision to the preferences of residents.  

Systemic risks 

  • Consultations showed that some incidents of gender-based violence have been viewed as solely race-based, with the role of gender overlooked. This suggests limited understanding of how racism and gender inequality intersect to drive such violence.   

  • With a few exceptions, most staff of Yugo Australia perform several functions in their roles. They manage the physical environment (e.g. arranging building maintenance), promote Yugo to potential new residents by providing tours of the sites, run programs for residents and are also frontline first responders to any behavioural issues or concerns. Some stakeholders noted that performing all these functions well means their ability to immediately respond to critical incidents can be compromised, particularly if they are lone workers.   

  • Yugo Australia employs some longer-term residents as ‘student ambassadors’. These ambassadors are typically aged between 18 and 22 and their casual role with Yugo is often  their first job in Australia. Ambassadors support induction of new residents, act as a contact point for residents seeking information or help, and manage the residence after hours, including weekends. This means they are immediate first responders to critical incidents after hours. Despite clear protocols that any safety-related incidents must be escalated to the on-call manager, some student ambassadors have used their discretion in deciding when to escalate. In some circumstances this has compromised their safety.  

  • There were differences in the experiences of women versus men student ambassadors in relation to residents’ compliance with their directions. A woman ambassador noted some residents did not follow her directions because they saw her as ‘just another student’; in contrast, a male student ambassador noted that residents generally complied with his directions and were respectful of his authority. This suggests that some residents may perceive men as more authoritative or better qualified to make decisions.  

  • Yugo Australia recognises the use of student ambassadors as after-hours staff presents a conflict-of-interest for the ambassador and provides challenges to the organisation’s ability to manage risks. 

Barriers 

  • Student ambassadors working as after-hours staff has been an established structure since Yugo’s beginnings in Australia. These residents value the opportunity to be leaders in their community and any changes to current practice will require socialisation.  

  • Challenging residents’ cultural views of men’s and women’s roles must be done safely.   

Key actions in response  

Yugo Australia will: 

  • considering cease use of student ambassadors as after-hours staff and engage a professional service to manage sites after hours 

  • consider how issues of health, safety and wellbeing issues can be better addressed in staff roles and responsibilities 

  • ensure prevention and bystander training increases people’s skills to challenge problematic views and behaviours safely.  

 

Focus area (c): Systems and infrastructure  

Systems and infrastructure assessment 

Enablers  

  • Yugo provides several channels through which residents can report any concerns, including making a disclosure. These channels include in person, by phoning reception, via the Yugo website, or through the Yugo app (under the broad heading of ‘inquiry’). Stakeholders commented that in their experience most disclosures and formal reports are made to Yugo staff in person.  

  • Student ambassadors, as residents and international students themselves, may often be the first point of contact for someone making a disclosure. Proximity in age and an understanding of some of the challenges international students face were cited as common reasons for residents disclosing to ambassadors.  

  • Yugo recently established a dedicated staff position to support residents aged under 18.  

 

Systemic Risks  

  • Currently, neither residents nor staff can make an anonymous disclosure or formal report.  

  • The current system used to intake disclosures and formal complaints lacks sufficient privacy and confidentiality safeguards. Disclosures or formal reports made by a resident through the Yugo app are automatically sent to the building’s residence manager and assistant residence managers, and it is unclear if residents are aware of where sensitive information may be shared. This raises particular concern in cases where a resident uses the app to report gender-based violence or other concerning behaviour of one of the managers who would automatically receive the report.  

  • All complaints made through the website are directed straight to the Area Manager. Internal and external pathways for staff or residents to make complaints about the Area Manager, the People Partner or leadership are very limited, and where they do exist there is minimal information about what and to whom sensitive information may be shared.   

  • There are currently no formal information-sharing agreements or systems in place with universities regarding critical incidents; instead, co-ordinated response efforts rely on personal relationships between Yugo staff and relevant university staff. Stakeholders commented that in some cases, particular universities have taken several days to respond to Yugo. This has sometimes resulted in the student not receiving the required support from their university. This is of particular concern given universities’ obligations to international students under the ESOS Act as well as child safety obligations where the resident is aged under 18.    

  • Some stakeholders commented there is no consistent approach among staff to documenting incidents in systems, or clear thresholds for deciding what information needs to be shared and with whom. In some cases, staff advised they have started their shift with limited knowledge of what has happened in their absence, which in their view has hindered their ability to continue to monitor and manage any risks. More broadly, inadequate record-keeping also has implications for the organisation should records be subpoenaed as part of a legal process.  

 

Barriers  

  • Student ambassadors have not received any training on how to respond to disclosures. 

 

Key actions in response  

Yugo Australia will: 

  • establish a mechanism for staff, residents and third parties to make anonymous disclosures and formal reports 

  • improve privacy and confidentiality safeguards in existing system or explore establishing an alternative system 

  • collaborate with universities to implement formal information-sharing protocols for managing critical incidents and accessing support after hours 

  • provide training to Yugo staff on how to record incidents 

  • provide training to staff on data privacy and confidentiality obligations in the context of risk management. 

 

 

Focus area (d): Service delivery  

Service delivery assessment  

Enablers  

Housing 

  • Yugo’s residents access building lifts and their living quarters through use of a personalised FOB key. Yugo staff can electronically adjust resident access to spaces as required. With the exception of residents’ individual rooms/apartments, CCTV is installed throughout all common areas in the building. 

  • Staff who work on-site alone are required to wear lone worker devices. 

  • In situations involving a suspected safety threat or incident, staff can subject to availability temporarily relocate residents to a single room in the same or another building as part of immediate crisis management.  

Wellbeing program 

  • In addition to housing, Yugo provides a ‘Live Your Best Life’ program for residents. The program aims to empower residents beyond the classroom and prepare them for their careers through three pillars: 

  • YugoEco, focusing on creating environmentally friendly living spaces and educating students on sustainable practices 

  • YuPro, which supports students' transition to and from student life by offering training, workshops and internships that enable social and economic mobility and opportunity 

  • YuGrow, designed to help students thrive socially, emotionally, and professionally during their university journey. 

Systemic Risks  

  • Yugo staff and residents in Melbourne have often been exposed to threats of violence from members of the public. Lack of speed gates at some building entry points, residents being ‘tailgated’ by others, and minimal physical barriers preventing public access to Yugo’s reception area has resulted in several concerning incidents. Yugo has planned works due in all current buildings to improve the physical security through secure reception spaces and speed gates or other similar solutions. At this time only Yugo Berkeley Street has not been upgraded however is in the capex plan for 2026.   

  • While CCTV is installed in common areas (such as study spaces, hallways), some Yugo staff are unaware of how to access live CCTV footage.  

  • While staff are required to wear lone worker devices, this does not always occur.  

  • As significantly large buildings, monitoring of shared common spaces is often dependent on the availability of staff to physically walk to the area as some are unaware of how to access live CCTV footage.  

Barriers  

  • Although the Live Your Best Life program aims to prepare residents for life beyond university and instil values so they can contribute to the broader community, the program lacks strong messaging about the importance of gender equality. 

  • Resident participation in the ‘Live Your Best Life’ program is dependent on study and other personal commitments.    

Key actions in response  

Yugo Australia will: 

  • continue to improve physical security measures in buildings, including through installation of speed gates (currently underway) 

  • educate staff on how to access live CCTV footage 

  • increase monitoring the use of lone worker devices 

  • include discussion of gender equality, safety, respect, diversity and inclusion in the Live Your Best Life program 

  • consider other ways to disseminate messages of equality, safety and respect to residents. 

 

 

Focus area (e): Policies and procedures 

Policies and procedures assessment 

Enablers  

  • Yugo Australia has the autonomy to create policies and procedures to specifically address the Australian context. Any policies created by Yugo Australia may also be adopted by Yugo Global if considered fit-for-purpose. Policies are reviewed by Yugo Australia on an annual basis.  

  • As an organisation that operates across the world, Yugo Australia’s policy framework has the potential to generate a positive ripple effect beyond the Australian context. Because many students are international, they can carry values of safety, equality and respect back to their home countries when they leave the accommodation, extending the organisation’s influence globally. 

  • As part of induction, all staff are provided with training on Yugo’s policies and procedures, including critical incident protocols.  

  • All staff are required to lodge an incident report within 24 hours following an incident, with guidance provided to staff on how to categorise the nature and level of severity of the incident.  

  • Yugo recently established a post-incident process to monitor the wellbeing of staff following an incident. Consultations showed this was welcomed by stakeholders.   

Systemic Risks  

  • Although diversity and inclusion play a central role in Yugo’s operations and marketing strategies to attract students, there is no formal organisational policy on promoting gender equality or diversity and inclusion. 

  • There is an existing staff policy on sexual misconduct and assault, but it does not recognise the gendered nature of these behaviours. It also does not include other forms of gender-based violence.  

  • Although the current Student Conduct policy discusses anti-social behaviour and physical assault, it does not specifically reference gender-based violence. The policy states that any instances of concerning behaviour will be investigated, but does not include details of what repercussions are available to impose on residents if they breach behavioural standards.  

  • Current Yugo Global guidance for staff on how to classify incidents potentially obscures the seriousness of incidents of gender-based violence and the response required from staff. For example, physical assault (regardless of the nature of the assault or the existing relationship between the parties) is classified in training materials as both an ‘accident’ and an ‘incident’, with limited information on the threshold used to distinguish between the two.  

  • This guidance also risks staff misunderstanding the ‘severity’ of any violent behaviour, including gender-based violence. Guidance indicates that any incident that requires reporting to external authorities (for example police or ambulance services) must be classified as either Category 3, 4 or 5, with 5 as the most extreme severity rating. Severity ratings are not universal; a scale designed to assess building safety issues – such as a fire – should not be applied in the same way to interpersonal violence.  

  • Yugo’s critical incident policy encourages staff to de-escalate incidents where possible, however no de-escalation training is provided to staff. This was noted as an issue by stakeholders.  

  • Yugo staff undertake information-gathering, including interviewing respondents, when an alleged incident of gender-based violence occurs. In the absence of specific knowledge about the effects of gender-based violence and tactics used by perpetrators in discussions about their behaviour, this poses a risk to the safety of staff and the complainant. This was recognised by stakeholders as a significant issue.  

Barriers  

  • Yugo Australia’s current critical incident response protocols and guidance are based on Yugo Global’s policy.  

Key actions in response  

Yugo Australia will: 

  • review and amend incident classification and associated training materials 

  • amend the Student Conduct policy to specifically reference gender-based violence and include repercussions that can be imposed 

  • provide de-escalation training to staff 

  • update all other relevant policies to emphasise values of safety, equality and respect 

  • engage external experts to undertake investigations relating to concerning behaviour.  

 

 

Focus area (f): Management and governance

Overall management of Yugo Australia is led by the Vice-President Operations APAC and UAE, with two direct reports. The Area Manager provides strategic oversight of the four properties, with day-to-day management of sites the responsibility of Residence Managers and Assistant Residence Managers. 

 

 

Management and governance assessment  

Enablers  

  • Although Yugo Australia operates four buildings on behalf of Yugo Global, Yugo Australia’s senior management operates with a certain degree of autonomy from the broader organisation to ensure its operations reflect the local context.   

  • Relationships between management and operational staff are broadly positive.  

Systemic Risks  

  • As noted earlier, operational staff fulfil a number of functions in their roles, from responding to building issues to managing critical incidents to being the ‘face’ of Yugo for prospective residents. While all staff indicated quick response times to critical incidents, some commented the nature of their roles can mean there is limited time available to actively prevent some safety or wellbeing issues from arising.  

  • Evidence shows that young women are more likely to experience gender-based violence than other age groups of women. Evidence also shows international students are one of the most vulnerable populations in Australia and experience a high risk of social isolation, exploitation in employment, financial insecurity, racism, and discrimination. Although all staff showed deep awareness of these issues, it is unclear whether they are considered, and therefore addressed, as organisational risks by Yugo Australia and Yugo Global.   

  • Unlike some of its international counterparts, Yugo Australia houses students aged under 18. To reflect this, in 2024 Yugo established a dedicated position to manage these students. While ‘guardianship’ of these students formally rests with the students’ universities, there is limited understanding among some staff of the organisation’s obligations under child safety legislation. It is unclear if there is an organisational framework to ensure Yugo is meeting these obligations.  

Barriers  

  • Yugo Australia’s current operating model and staffing largely reflects the approach of Yugo Global.  

Key actions in response  

Yugo Australia will: 

  • identify and address gender-based violence and other safety and wellbeing issues as organisational risks  

  • consider establishing a role to oversee safety, health and wellbeing across all sites 

  • establish an organisational framework for child safety  

  • deliver training to all staff on child safety obligations.